SOC 3

A SOC 3 is short on purpose. Read it for what it is.

The AICPA describes a SOC 3 as a report on controls relevant to the Trust Services Criteria that is meant for general use and may be freely distributed. It reaches the same kind of conclusion a SOC 2 does, but it keeps out the detail that makes a SOC 2 useful to a security reviewer. This page explains what is inside, who it is for, and where its limits lie.

Back to SOC 2 services

01 · What is inside

Three parts, a few pages long

An opinion, an assertion, and a short description of the system.

The independent service auditor's report
The CPA firm's opinion on whether controls were effective to meet the service commitments and system requirements based on the chosen Trust Services Criteria.
Management's assertion
The company's signed claim about its controls over the period, which the opinion addresses.
A description of the system
A brief account of the system boundaries and the principal commitments the company makes to its customers. Far shorter than a SOC 2 description.

The engine underneath is the same one used for a SOC 2: an examination under the AICPA's attestation standards, AT-C 105 and 205, measured against the Trust Services Criteria (TSP section 100). What changes is the reader, and so the amount of detail.

02 · Who can read it

Anyone can read it

General use means no restriction on who receives it.

A SOC 2 is written for informed parties who understand the system, so its use is restricted. A SOC 3 has no such restriction. The AICPA states that SOC 3 reports are general-use reports that can be freely distributed. That is what makes it suitable for a website, a sales deck or a tender response sent to people you have never met.

  1. Prospects early in a dealA quick signal before an NDA is signed.
  2. Procurement teamsA document to file that names the criteria, the period and the firm.
  3. Partners and the publicEvidence that an independent CPA firm examined controls.
  4. Security reviewersUseful context, but rarely enough on its own for a deep review.

03 · What it leaves out

What a SOC 3 deliberately leaves out

No tests, no results, no detailed control list.

In a SOC 3

  • The opinion and the criteria used
  • The period covered
  • Management's assertion
  • A short system description

Not in a SOC 3

  • The CPA firm's tests of controls and their results
  • Individual exceptions found in testing
  • The full control-by-control description
  • The detailed lists of complementary user entity controls a SOC 2 sets out

If a reader needs to see how a control was tested or what deviations were found, the SOC 2 is the document to request.

04 · What not to infer

What a reader should not infer from a SOC 3

A clean opinion is a statement about controls in a period, not a promise.

  • “They have never had an incident.”. The report concerns whether controls met the criteria. It does not list incidents for a public reader.
  • “Every product is covered.”. Only the system named in the description is in scope. Check the boundary.
  • “It is current.”. It covers a stated period. Months after that period ends, it says nothing about today.
  • “Testing found nothing.”. Exceptions can exist even under an unmodified opinion. A SOC 3 simply does not show them.
  • “All five categories were examined.”. Many reports cover Security only. The report names which categories were included.

05 · A reading example

Illustrative: a buyer reads a SOC 3 in five minutes

What a careful reader checks and what they ask for next.

  1. Find the CPA firm's name and confirm it is a licensed firm, not a consultancy.
  2. Read the period and note how long ago it ended.
  3. Check which Trust Services categories were included.
  4. Read the system boundary and confirm it covers the product being bought.
  5. Read the opinion paragraph for any qualification.
  6. If the purchase carries real risk, request the SOC 2 under NDA.

Sources: AICPA SOC 3 topic page (SOC for Service Organizations: Trust Services Criteria for General Use Report) and its illustrative SOC 3 report; AICPA SSAE No. 18, AT-C sections 105 and 205, as amended; AICPA TSP section 100, 2017 Trust Services Criteria with revised points of focus. The reading example is illustrative.

Questions about SOC 3

Is a SOC 3 a lighter audit than a SOC 2?

No. The examination is comparable; the report is shorter.

The CPA firm still examines controls against the Trust Services Criteria. The difference lies in what the report shows: the opinion and a summary, without the tests and results.

Who issues a SOC 3?

A licensed CPA firm.

Only a licensed CPA firm independent of the company can perform the examination and issue the report. Advisers such as Auditify help prepare for it; they do not issue it.

Is there a Type 1 SOC 3?

In practice, a SOC 3 covers a period.

SOC 3 reports address whether controls were effective throughout a period, which is why they are usually produced alongside a SOC 2 Type 2. Confirm the approach with your CPA firm.

Can a SOC 3 show exceptions?

Not in the detail a SOC 2 does.

Individual test exceptions are not set out. A modified opinion, if there is one, would appear in the opinion itself, which is why it is worth reading in full.

Decide whether a public report fits your sales motion.

We help you scope the SOC 2 examination a SOC 3 is built from, and plan how each report will be shared.