- Home
- Compliance
- SOC 2 Compliance
- Availability criteria
Availability category
Availability: three criteria about staying up.
Availability asks one thing: is the system there when customers need it, as you promised? It adds three criteria, A1.1 to A1.3, to the common criteria. They cover capacity, the protections and backups behind the service, and whether you have tested getting it back.
Back to SOC 2 services01 · What it covers
What Availability measures, and what it does not
Your promise sets the bar. The category tests the controls that keep you to it.
The criteria define availability as information and systems being ready for operation and use to meet your objectives. The category does not set a minimum uptime of its own, and it does not judge whether features work well. It looks at whether controls support the system being reachable, monitored and maintainable.
The number comes from you
An auditor does not bring an uptime target. It comes from your contracts, SLAs and system description. The higher the promise, the more your capacity, backup and recovery controls must show.
02 · What triggers it
How an uptime clause pulls the category in
Scope follows commitments. Read what you have signed before you choose.
| What you have committed to (illustrative) | Points towards Availability? | Why |
|---|---|---|
| A service credit if monthly uptime drops below a figure | Yes | A measurable promise customers rely on |
| A recovery time or recovery point in a contract | Yes | It is a promise about getting back up |
| A public status page with a stated target | Likely | Buyers read it as a commitment |
| “Best effort” support hours only | Usually not | No promise about the system being up |
| Internal tool with no customer-facing promise | Usually not | Nothing for the report to vouch for |
If buyers ask for Availability but no contract mentions uptime, ask why. Often a buyer's own continuity duties depend on you, and the category is how they get comfort. That is a sound reason; adding it for appearance is not.
03 · A1.1 to A1.3
The three Availability criteria
Capacity, protection and recovery infrastructure, then proof that recovery works.
- A1.1Capacity is managedYou track how much capacity is used, forecast demand and add capacity before you run short. Example: utilisation dashboards with thresholds that open a ticket.
- A1.2Protections, backups and recovery infrastructureYou build, run and watch environmental protections, backup processes and the infrastructure you would recover onto. Example: daily automated backups to a separate region with failure alerts.
- A1.3Recovery plans are testedYou test the procedures that restore the system. Example: a documented restore test and a continuity exercise, with fixes logged.
- Environmental threatsPower, fire, water, cooling. In the cloud these sit mostly with the provider; you show you rely on and review its report.
- Backup distanceCopies far enough from the primary that one event is unlikely to take out both.
- Alternate infrastructureA way to move processing elsewhere if the main environment is lost.
- Restore integrityTesting that backups are complete and readable, not just that the job ran.
04 · Evidence
What an auditor asks for under A1
Most of it is generated by your tools. The test record is the part you create by hand.
- Capacity. Monitoring dashboards, alert thresholds, and tickets raised when a limit was approached.
- Backups. Backup configuration, the job history for the period, and how failures were followed up.
- Restore test. A dated record of a restore: what was restored, from when, whether it worked, who checked.
- Continuity exercise. The scenario, who took part, what broke, and the plan changes that followed.
- Provider reliance. Your cloud provider's SOC report and your review of it, including its user-entity controls.
05 · Mistakes
Where Availability goes wrong
Almost always the test, not the technology.
- No recovery test in the period. A Type 2 needs the test to happen inside the window. Last year's test does not count.
- Testing the backup job, not the restore. A green job status proves a file was written, not that the service can come back.
- A promise the design can't meet. A recovery time in the contract that a single-region setup could never achieve.
- Capacity alerts nobody reads. Thresholds that fire into a channel no one watches show monitoring, not management.
- Forgetting the provider. Relying on the cloud for environmental protection without reviewing its report.
- OverviewTrust Services CriteriaThe five categories, with CC1 to CC9 read as questions your controls answer.
- SecurityThe Security category, criterion by criterionCC1 to CC9 in plain words, with the evidence each invites.
- ConfidentialityThe Confidentiality categoryC1.1 and C1.2: identifying, protecting and disposing of confidential data.
- PrivacyThe Privacy categoryP1 to P8: notice, choice, collection, use, access, disclosure, quality, monitoring.
- Processing IntegrityThe Processing Integrity categoryPI1.1 to PI1.5: complete, valid, accurate and timely processing.
Sources: AICPA, TSP section 100, 2017 Trust Services Criteria (revised points of focus), availability category definition and criteria A1.1 to A1.3; AICPA DC section 200 for commitments in the system description. Examples are illustrative.
Questions about Availability
Does Availability mean we must hit a certain uptime?
Only the one you promised.
The category sets no figure of its own. It tests whether your controls support the commitments you made. Missing your own target is something the description and the auditor may need to address, so promise what you can keep.
Our provider runs the data centre. What is left for us?
Capacity, backups, recovery and the test.
Environmental protection is largely the provider's, and you show you rely on it through its report. Your capacity planning, backup design, recovery plan and the evidence that you tested it remain yours.
Is a full failover drill required?
The criterion asks for testing, not a specific drill.
A1.3 asks that recovery procedures are tested. The depth should match your commitments. Whatever you write in your control (for example a yearly restore test) becomes what the auditor checks.
Can we add Availability in the middle of a period?
Better at the start of the next one.
A Type 2 tests controls across the whole period. Adding a category part-way leaves months with no evidence. Plan it into the next period's scope.
Related guides
Promise uptime you can prove.
We read your SLAs, set the Availability scope they imply, and design a recovery test an auditor can sample.