The report

Independence: the line between helping you and auditing you.

A SOC 2 opinion is only worth something if the firm giving it had no stake in the result. That is why the standards require the examining CPA firm to be independent of you, and why the people who help you prepare sit on the other side of a clear line. Auditify works on the preparation side. The examination belongs to a separate, independent CPA firm.

Back to SOC 2 services

01 · Two roles

Two roles that must not merge

One party helps you get ready. Another, independent one, examines.

Readiness and advisory (for example, Auditify)

  • Gap assessment against the criteria
  • Advice on control design and evidence
  • Support drafting management's documents
  • Coordinating the examination

The examining CPA firm

  • Plans and performs the examination
  • Tests controls and evaluates evidence
  • Forms and signs the opinion
  • Must stay independent of you throughout

Management sits between the two. It decides, owns the controls and signs the assertion.

02 · What the rules say

What the professional standards require

Independence is a condition of accepting the engagement, not a courtesy.

The attestation standards (AT-C section 105) require a practitioner to be independent to perform an examination. Independence is defined by the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct: its independence rule, a conceptual framework for identifying threats, and specific rules on services a firm may provide to a client it also attests for, called nonattest services.

The core idea is simple. A firm must not take on management responsibilities for an attest client, such as designing, implementing or operating internal control, making decisions on management's behalf, or owning the client's records. If it did, its opinion would be about its own choices.

These rules bind the CPA firm. A readiness provider that does not examine you is not giving an opinion, so its role is limited by a different principle: decisions stay with your management.

03 · Threats

The threats that undermine independence

Named in the AICPA's conceptual framework. Each has a SOC 2 version.

Self-review
The firm tests controls it designed, or evidence it produced. It is unlikely to find fault with its own work.
Management participation
The firm makes decisions only management should make, such as which controls to adopt or which risks to accept.
Advocacy
The firm promotes your position to buyers or regulators, which sits badly with judging it.
Self-interest
The firm's fees or finances depend on the outcome, such as a fee tied to a clean opinion.
Familiarity
Long or close relationships blunt professional scepticism.
Undue influence
Pressure from the client to reach a particular conclusion.

04 · Who may do what

Who may do what

Illustrative split. Your CPA firm's own independence assessment has the final word.

ActivityReadiness providerExamining CPA firm
Explain the criteria and what auditors look forYesYes
Run a gap assessment and recommend fixesYes; management decidesLimited; must not take management decisions
Write policies and controls for you to adoptCan draft; management reviews, adopts and ownsNo
Operate a control (for example run your access reviews)Avoid; it blurs who owns the controlNo
Draft the system descriptionCan support; management owns and asserts itNo
Test controls and sign the opinionNoYes

05 · Structuring it

Structuring engagements so the report holds up

Keep the paper trail clear about who decided what.

  1. Engage the readiness provider and the CPA firm separately, with separate contracts.
  2. Record management's decisions: which recommendations were adopted, by whom, when.
  3. Make sure every control has an internal owner who runs it, not an outside adviser.
  4. Disclose the readiness provider's role to the CPA firm at the start.
  5. Ask both parties about referral fees or commissions between them, and get the answer in writing.
  6. Keep the CPA firm out of design work once it is engaged to examine.

06 · Questions to ask

Questions to ask before you sign anything

Each one has a short, clear answer if things are set up properly.

  • To the CPA firm. How have you assessed your independence from us, and from anyone who prepared us?
  • To the CPA firm. Have you or an affiliate provided any other services to us in the past year?
  • To the CPA firm. Do you pay or receive any fee connected with referring us?
  • To the readiness provider. Which deliverables will we need to adopt and own as management?
  • To the readiness provider. Will anything you do count as operating a control on our behalf?
  • To yourselves. Could we explain every control to the auditor without our adviser in the room?

Sources: AICPA attestation standards AT-C section 105 (independence as a condition of an attestation engagement); AICPA Code of Professional Conduct, independence rule, conceptual framework and nonattest services interpretations; AICPA Guide, SOC 2 Reporting on an Examination of Controls at a Service Organization.

Questions about independence

If our adviser drafted the policies, is the report compromised?

Not if management reviewed, adopted and owns them, and the adviser is not the examiner.

Advisers draft documents all the time. What matters is that management made the decisions and runs the controls, and that the examining firm had no hand in creating them.

Can a CPA firm offer both readiness and the examination?

Only within the nonattest services rules, and many choose not to.

The Code permits some nonattest services to an attest client if the firm avoids management responsibilities and meets its conditions. Designing or operating your controls is not one of them. Ask the firm how it assessed this before you agree.

Does Auditify issue the SOC 2 report?

No. A separate, independent licensed CPA firm does.

Auditify provides readiness and advisory work. The examination, the testing and the opinion come from an independent CPA firm, which must remain independent of you.

Would a buyer ever ask about this?

Careful reviewers do.

Security reviewers sometimes ask who prepared you and who examined you. A clean answer, two separate firms with clear roles, avoids a doubt that would otherwise hang over the report.

Does changing CPA firms each year help independence?

Not necessarily. It mainly adds cost and learning time.

Familiarity can be a threat, but firms address it through their own safeguards. Changing firms is a business decision. Keep periods abutting if you do.

Prepare with one party, get examined by another.

Auditify handles SOC 2 readiness. Your examination stays with an independent CPA firm.