ISO 27001 clauses

Clause 6 turns what you learned in clause 4 into decisions an auditor can check.

Clause 6 is the planning core of the standard. It carries your context into a risk assessment, the risk decisions into a set of controls and a Statement of Applicability, and the whole effort into objectives with owners and dates. It also asks that changes to the ISMS are planned. This page is the map; the risk method has its own guide.

Back to ISO 27001 services

01 · The map

From context to objectives, in order

Each step consumes the output of the one before it.

  1. Start from the issues, parties and scope of clause 4.
  2. Decide the risks and opportunities that could help or harm the ISMS itself (6.1.1).
  3. Assess information security risks with criteria set in advance (6.1.2).
  4. Choose a treatment for each risk and the controls it needs (6.1.3).
  5. Compare those controls with Annex A and record the result in the Statement of Applicability.
  6. Set security objectives and plan who achieves them, with what, by when (6.2).
  7. Plan any change to the ISMS before making it (6.3).
  1. 6.1
    Actions to address risks and opportunitiesSplit into a general part, the risk assessment and the risk treatment.
  2. 6.2
    Information security objectives and planning to achieve themTargets that follow from the policy and the risk results.
  3. 6.3
    Planning of changesAdded in the 2022 edition: changes to the ISMS are made deliberately.

02 · Risks and opportunities

The general part: risks to the ISMS, not only to data

6.1.1 is wider than security incidents. It asks what could stop the system working.

Information security risks threaten your data and services. The general part of 6.1 asks a second question: what could stop the ISMS delivering what it promised, and what could make it better? It is easy to skip, and auditors notice.

Risks to the ISMS

  • The only person who understands the risk register resigns
  • A rapid hiring wave outpaces onboarding training
  • A new product launches without passing through risk review

Opportunities

  • Combining ISO 27001 and SOC 2 evidence into one programme
  • Moving to single sign-on during a planned tool migration
  • Using a customer's audit request to fund a test you needed anyway

Illustrative. Many teams keep these in the same register as security risks, tagged so they are easy to find. Each needs a planned action and a check on whether it worked.

03 · Risk work and the SoA

Assessment, treatment and the Statement of Applicability

The deep method lives on its own page. Here is how the pieces join.

6.1.2 asks for a defined way to find, analyse and evaluate risks. 6.1.3 asks you to choose treatments, pick the controls they need, check them against Annex A so nothing necessary is missed, and record everything in the Statement of Applicability. Risk owners then approve the treatment plan and accept what risk remains. The method, scales and records are covered in our risk guide; building the SoA has its own page too.

04 · Objectives

Security objectives, and the plan behind each one

An objective without an owner, a measure and a date is a wish.

Objectives should follow from the policy and the risk results, be measurable where that is practical, and be tracked, communicated and updated. For each one, the plan names the work, the resources, the owner, the deadline and how the result will be judged.

Objective (illustrative)MeasureOwnerDueHow it is judged
Patch critical vulnerabilities quicklyShare of critical findings fixed within the target windowHead of platformEach quarterMonthly report from the scanner
Keep staff alert to phishingReport rate in simulated phishingPeople leadTwice a yearSimulation results against the last run
Recover the core service reliablySuccessful restore tests against the recovery targetSRE leadEach half-yearRestore test record

05 · Planning of changes

Planning changes to the ISMS itself

6.3 covers changes to the management system, not every code deploy.

Operational changes to systems are handled by the change management control in Annex A. Clause 6.3 is about the ISMS: a wider scope, a new risk method, a reorganised security team, a new compliance tool. Each should have a reason, a plan and a check that nothing falls through the gap.

  • Record the change and its purpose.
  • Name what it affects: scope, risk register, SoA, roles, documents.
  • Assign resources and an owner.
  • Confirm afterwards that the ISMS still works as intended.

06 · Outputs

What clause 6 leaves behind

The outputs an auditor will ask for, and which must be written down.

OutputSub-clauseKept as documented information?Usual owner
Risks and opportunities for the ISMS, with actions6.1.1Expected in practiceISMS lead
Risk assessment process6.1.2YesISMS lead
Risk treatment process6.1.3YesISMS lead
Statement of Applicability6.1.3YesISMS lead, approved by leadership
Risk treatment plan, approved by risk owners6.1.3Yes, with the results under clause 8Risk owners
Security objectives6.2YesTop management
Record of planned ISMS changes6.3Expected in practiceISMS lead
  • Objectives with no measure. “Improve security” cannot be shown as met or missed.
  • An SoA written before the risk work. Controls ticked first and risks reverse-engineered later read as backwards to an auditor.
  • No ISMS-level risks. Only asset risks in the register, nothing about the system itself.

Sources: ISO/IEC 27001:2022 clause numbers and titles (6.1, 6.1.1 to 6.1.3, 6.2, 6.3) and the public list of Annex A themes. Descriptions, objectives and examples are Auditify's own and illustrative.

Clause 6, answered

What is new in clause 6 in the 2022 edition?

Mainly 6.3, planning of changes, and lighter edits elsewhere.

The 2022 edition added 6.3 so changes to the ISMS are made in a planned way. It also asks for objectives to be monitored and kept as documented information. The Annex A reference moved to the new set of 93 controls.

Do opportunities really need to be recorded?

The clause asks you to consider them. A short list with actions is the usual evidence.

Auditors look for signs that you thought about what could improve the ISMS, not only what could harm it. A few tagged entries with owners usually settles the question.

How many security objectives should we have?

Few enough to track; commonly three to six.

There is no set number. Each objective needs an owner, a measure and regular review, so a long list quickly becomes unmanageable. Pick the ones tied to your top risks.

Is clause 6 a one-time exercise?

No. Planning repeats as the business and risks change.

Clause 6 sets up the process; clause 8 runs it again at planned intervals and after significant change. Objectives are revisited at each management review.

Get the planning chain right before Stage 1 reads it.

An ISO 27001 gap analysis checks that your context, risk work, SoA and objectives connect the way an auditor expects.