Glossary · SOC and attestation

Type 2 asks the harder question: did the controls keep working?

A SOC report in which the CPA firm tests and gives an opinion on whether controls operated effectively throughout a stated period, in addition to their design.

Back to the glossary

01 · In plain words

In plain words

A SOC report in which the CPA firm tests and gives an opinion on whether controls operated effectively throughout a stated period, in addition to their design.

A Type 2 report covers a stretch of time, not a single day. The examiner samples evidence across that period to see whether each control actually ran as described. The results, including any misses, are listed control by control.

02 · Why it matters

Why it matters

Who cares about this, and what depends on it.

Most enterprise buyers and their auditors want a Type 2, because it shows behaviour, not intent. It lets a reader see, for instance, that terminated staff lost access promptly in the sampled cases across the year. The report also lists deviations, so a reader can judge whether a miss matters to them. For the service provider, it means evidence must be kept continuously, since the examiner can sample any point in the period.

03 · Where you meet it

Where you will meet it

The documents, meetings and reports where it appears.

The report's title page
States "for the period" with a start and end date.
Section 4 of the report
Each control, the examiner's test, and the result, including exceptions.
A customer's annual vendor review
Checked for period coverage and any deviations relevant to them.
A bridge letter
Issued by management to cover the gap between the period's end and today.

04 · An example

A worked example

An illustration, not a real client.

Illustrative: one deviation in a reconciliation firm's report

A Mumbai payments-reconciliation provider receives a SOC 1 Type 2 for a nine-month period. In 25 sampled leavers, one account was disabled eleven days late. The report lists this as a deviation, and management's response explains the cause and the fix. A bank client's auditor reads it, checks that the late account had no activity, and concludes it does not change their reliance on the report.

05 · Easy to mix up

Easy to mix up with

Neighbouring terms that mean something different.

Type 1 report
Covers design at one date only. A Type 2 also tests operation across a period.
Observation period
The window a Type 2 covers. The report is the result; the period is the time it describes.

06 · What to do

What to do with it

Practical steps, and the guides that go deeper.

  • Choose a period length your buyers accept; periods of three to twelve months are commonly used, with later reports usually covering twelve.
  • Keep evidence as controls run, with dates, owners and sources.
  • Prepare a written response for any deviation the examiner finds.
  • Plan back-to-back periods so coverage has no gaps.

Sources: AICPA AT-C sections 205 and 320; AICPA Guide, SOC 2 Reporting on an Examination of Controls at a Service Organization; AICPA Guide, Reporting on an Examination of Controls at a Service Organization Relevant to User Entities' Internal Control Over Financial Reporting (SOC 1).

Questions about Type 2 report

Does one deviation mean the report failed?

Not necessarily.

A deviation is listed with the test result. Whether it changes the opinion depends on how serious and widespread it is. Many reports contain a few deviations and still carry an unmodified opinion.

Can the first SOC report be a Type 2?

Yes.

There is no rule that a Type 1 must come first. A company with controls already running can start an observation period and go straight to a Type 2.

Want this applied to your own systems?

Our team can walk through where this term touches your scope, your contracts and your evidence.